§ Comparison · honest · no "the best"
No-code vs custom dev.
No-code (Bubble, Webflow, Make) solves many real problems. Custom dev solves others. This comparison explains the point where switching pays off.
Where differences show
Frequently asked questions
If your question isn't here, email us at hola@ago.cl or via WhatsApp.
01 When is no-code (Bubble, Webflow) the right choice?
MVP to validate business idea in 2 weeks. Institutional site with CMS (Webflow). Campaign landing pages. Internal automation with Make/Zapier connecting existing SaaS. If your team doesn't have devs and the problem fits in no-code tools, it wins on time-to-market and cost.
02 When does it pay to migrate to custom dev?
Platform cost > USD 300/mo consistently (signal you've scaled). Core Web Vitals worsening (LCP > 3s hurts SEO). Business logic that no longer fits visual workflows. More than 5,000 active daily users. Bidirectional integrations with own APIs. Data sovereignty need (don't want Bubble holding your customers).
03 Does Bubble scale to millions of users?
Technically yes, but cost becomes prohibitive. Bubble charges by workload units (WU). Apps with 10,000+ daily active users typically exceed USD 1,000/mo. At that point, custom dev pays off in 6-12 months. Webflow CMS has 10,000 item per site hard limit.
04 Can I migrate my Bubble app to custom?
Yes, but not trivial. Bubble doesn't export workflows or database in standard format. The typical process is: 1) manually document each workflow, 2) export data via API or CSV, 3) rewrite logic in code (Django, Node or another stack), 4) migrate users with password reset. Timeline depends on the size and complexity of the original app. The initial no-cost conversation is for estimating scope.
Did your app hit no-code's ceiling?
Let's talk about migrating to custom. If no-code still fits, we'll say so.